The story goes something like this: a 50 year old man targets little kids at a water park and takes dozens of pictures of their private areas.
He gets arrested and prosecuted under a law intended to protect adults from non-consensual voyeuristic photography.
Two Texas courts upend the
conviction on the basis that the behavior of the defendant was a form of free speech.
I think they may have overlooked the difference between photographic predation and free speech.
So here are some examples of free speech:
Taking pictures of other people without consent for the purposes of sexual gratification is not free speech. It is a form of exploitation
What ass’s orifice do these people have their heads lodged in?
Have they lost any perspective on the implications for children of allowing them to be exploited at public parks and pools?
The defendant’s lawyers said the law is “Orwellian.” Perhaps all parties need to read Orwell before they drag him into defending a pedophile.
And last but not least–
News feeds are glutted with comments about the actresses whose naked pictures were hacked and leaked. I read this as a stand-alone article from an English news source.
Shouldn’t the lack of concern for the safety of our children be a bigger deal?